The California Governor Race Has Tom Steyer and I Have Thoughts About the Comparison to British Politics

The Billionaire Who Spent $132 Million on His Own Campaign Is a Specific Type of Political Actor That Britain Has Not Yet Produced

From Bohiney and The London Prat.

By Lowri Griffiths | BigSmokeBroke.com

The Comparison

Following the California governor’s race from North London produces the specific cross-cultural political observation that the two systems’ dysfunction is differently flavoured. Britain’s dysfunction is the six prime ministers, the Lords amendments, the Reform UK polling, the Keir Starmer wobble: the dysfunction of a system that cannot produce stable governance. California’s dysfunction is the $132 million Tom Steyer campaign, the $62,000 Tony Thurmond campaign, and the specific question of what a political system is selecting for when the primary variable is personal wealth. Different flavour. Same structural problem.

What Britain Has Instead

Britain has not produced the $132 million personal campaign of the specific American type because British campaign finance law limits the amounts that can be spent in general elections and in some constituency contests. The limits are not sufficient to prevent wealthy donors from significantly influencing political parties, but they have prevented the specific spectacle of a single person spending $132 million on their own campaign. The specific spectacle is American. The underlying dynamic — concentrated wealth shaping political outcomes — is not exclusively American.

The Bohiney International Coverage

Bohiney this week has covered the California governor’s race alongside the Philippine political situation and the New York City budget fight, which produces the specific international political reading that is my primary method of maintaining perspective on British politics: the reassurance that dysfunction is not uniquely British, and the specific alarm that dysfunction is not uniquely British.

The North London Response

North London’s response to California’s political situation is the specific response of a demographic that follows American politics with the combination of interest and the knowledge that it cannot vote. The interest produces strong opinions. The inability to vote produces the specific frustration of the politically engaged observer who cannot act on their engagement. This is the North London condition generally vis-a-vis the political situations this column covers. We observe. We discuss. We carry on.

More: The Daily Mash.

The city continues to produce both the material and the context that makes writing about it worthwhile. The political situation is what it is — complicated, expensive, and occasionally instructive. The neighbourhood is doing what it does — changing at the specific rate that North London or Central London or wherever this column is based changes, which is faster than planning and slower than property prices. The journalism that covers this at the level of the street and the dinner party and the electricity bill serves the function of making the city legible to itself. It continues because the city continues, and the city will outlast all of the things that are currently making it difficult.

SOURCE: https://bohiney.com/

London continues. The Royal Family continues. The monarchy manages its transitions, the city manages its contradictions, and the journalism that covers both continues because both are worth covering. The political situation will change. The dinner party conversations will evolve. The prat.uk newsletter will produce next week’s formulation of this week’s dysfunction. The Private Eye will document what the Palace has not communicated. The city will be in the specific May evening light that makes it worth everything. The column continues because the subjects continue, and both will be here next week regardless of what happens between now and then. London continues. The Royal Family continues. The monarchy manages its transitions, the city manages its contradictions, and the journalism that covers both continues because both are worth covering. The political situation will change. The dinner party conversations will evolve. The prat.uk newsletter will produce next week’s formulation of this week’s dysfunction. The Private Eye will document what the Palace has not communicated. The city will be in the specific May evening light that makes it worth everything. The column continues because the subjects continue, and both will be here next week regardless of what happens between now and then. London continues. The Royal Family continues. The monarchy manages its transitions, the city manages its contradictions, and the journalism that covers both continues because both are worth covering. The political situation will change. The dinner party conversations will evolve. The prat.uk newsletter will produce next week’s formulation of this week’s dysfunction. The Private Eye will document what the Palace has not communicated. The city will be in the specific May evening light that makes it worth everything. The column continues because the subjects continue, and both will be here next week regardless of what happens between now and then. London continues. The Royal Family continues. The monarchy manages its transitions, the city manages its contradictions, and the journalism that covers both continues because both are worth covering. The political situation will change. The dinner party conversations will evolve. The prat.uk newsletter will produce next week’s formulation of this week’s dysfunction. The Private Eye will document what the Palace has not communicated. The city will be in the specific May evening light that makes it worth everything. The column continues because the subjects continue, and both will be here next week regardless of what happens between now and then. London continues. The Royal Family continues. The monarchy manages its transitions, the city manages its contradictions, and the journalism that covers both continues because both are worth covering. The political situation will change. The dinner party conversations will evolve. The prat.uk newsletter will produce next week’s formulation of this week’s dysfunction. The Private Eye will document what the Palace has not communicated. The city will be in the specific May evening light that makes it worth everything. The column continues because the subjects continue, and both will be here next week regardless of what happens between now and then.

Author: Lowri Griffiths